Non-Fungible Tokens in India- Implications Buyers Must Consider

NFTs are an attempt to enforce decentralization, ownership tracking, and value storage, while also making the lawful owner’s claim to the original work visible in the event of duplication. It aims to act as valid proof of ownership and grants the creator “digital bragging rights” through traceable proof of ownership. However, the legality of such digital assets remains a major concern. Concerns have been expressed regarding the legal status and the authenticity of such tokens, especially in India.

[Image source:Gettyimage]

Non-Fungible Tokens in India- Implications buyers must consider Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) are digital assets that may be accustomed establishto establishing the ownership and value of an underlying digital asset, like an explicit image, video, or audio. they’reThey’re issued on these assets using blockchain technology and smart contracts, which generate unique digital signatures and establish their security. they’reThere is currently a highly speculative market to speculate in, susceptible to rapid plunges or upswings and cyber security threats, making them enormously volatile assets to acquire and maintain. Something that NFTs try to be an answer to is that thethey have to confirm ownership. Currently, digital content over-saturates the net and tracking and identifying the initial owner of labour placed on virtual platforms is usually challenging, leading to a decrease within the value of the first work since they’re easily replicated and redistributed.

1. General Law

Although cryptocurrency has been present and around in India for the last ten years, the first debate about its legality began in June 2018, when the banking company of India (RBI) issued a circular advising bankscircular advising banks to notnot to deal in cryptocurrencies.
The Supreme Court struck down the RBI’s order in Internet and Mobile Association of India vs. Ddepository Ffinancial Iinstitution of India stating the correct to trade could be a basic right under Article 19(1)(f) of the Constitution, and thus, cryptocurrencies may well be lawfully traded.

2. Security Law

Whether trading in NFTs is prohibited under the Securities Contract Regulation Act, 1956 (SCRA) is uncertain because there’s no formal or legal structure of legislation for NFTs. As a result, there’s no categorization of NFTs under the SCRA. Some consider NFTs to be contracts, while others consider them to be derivatives. Trading in NFTs would be illegal in India if the latter is true.
To explain this further: under Section 2(ac) of the SCRA, the term “derivative” is defined as “a contract whose value comes from the costs of the underlying securities”. If NFTs are considered derivatives, they cannot be traded on virtual platforms as per Section 18a.

3. Copyrights Act

Although, as mentioned above, NFTs are a shot to ascertain “ownership” of a virtual asset, owning an NFT does not necessarily entail ownership of the work of art represented by the NFT. When the NFT is purchased, the owner doesn’t get the copyright to the underlying piece of art. Cconsistent with Section 19 of the Copyright Act of 1957, to transfer copyright and be thought to be an owner, a written sale contract declaring explicit assignment of copyright must be present.

4. Revenue enhancement Regulations

In most cases, the sort of the underlying asset should dictate the tax treatment of NFTs. Example: For revenue enhancement and Goods and Services Tax (GST) purposes, a digital art NFT can be considered an assetsasset or good, and taxes should be declared and remitted on the identical.   With that in mind, the govt recently declared a flat 30% tax on any income from all virtual digital assets, which incorporates NFTs. Such heavy taxation is certain to be discouraging todiscourage newcomers and day traders who make multiple transactions in an exceedingly single day. If this causes current and potential investors to exit the arena, the worth of such crypto and associated digital assets could plummet sharply — although it’s nigh impossible to predict any trends when it involves crypto since it’s so volatile in nature.

5. Interchange Management Act Regulations

The classification of the underlying asset being transferred via the NFT, whether physical or digital, would decide the treatment under the current Foreign Eexchange Management Act (FEMA), which regulates cross-border transactions. To stipulate, NFTs could also be categorized as “intangible assets” and governed under the software and property laws a part of the FEMA regulations. Hence, determining their location is very important since they’re supported by “global ledgers”, which implies that the data is logged, shared, and synchronized across data stores.

6. Collective Investment Schemes

Collective Investment Schemes (CIS) are often within the variety of ‘investment funds’ or ‘mutual funds. The qualities of an NFT, furthermore because the rights granted to the token purchasers, will determine whether it’s a financial instrument or not and also the non-fungibility of the token has no referring to the NFT’s regulatory status. As per the Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI), an existing CIS that fails to file a registration application or is denied provisional registration or doesn’t fits the SEBI guidelines on Collective Investment Schemes after being granted provisional registration must be tense and will even be subject to other penal provisions under the SEBI Act.

What’s Next?

To conclude about Legal Implications of NFTs, there’s no separate legal framework for NFTs in India and that they are currently only governed by the overall principles of contract. Most buyers and enthusiasts are keen to leap on the NFT bandwagon to form a fast buck. That said, there has been a downturn in interest when it involves buying them. Several economic experts, including Noble laureates, have said that crypto contains no intrinsic value and have likened NFTs to scams like pyramid (multi-level-marketing) schemes, Ponzi schemes or the “greater fool” scam. As such, the sale and get of tokenized artwork raises concerns about the anomaly surrounding its legal validity, and other legal issues like the enforcement of copyright holders’ and NFT holders’ rights, creator and holder liability, the applicability of assorted other intersecting laws, the exhaustion of copyright holders’ rights after the primary sale and multiple other concerns. When it involves NFTs, it might be prudent to follow the Latin maxim caveat emptor or ‘buyer beware’. those who transact digitally in NFTs have to remember of the hazards and risks related to them before treading in such murky waters.

Author: Ayusman Das, Siliguri, in case of any queries please contact/write back to us at support@ipandlegalfilings.com or   IP & Legal Filing.