Islamic Law and Human Rights: Evolution, Challenges, and Contemporary Relevance

The relationship of Islamic law and human rights has now become part of current scholarly research. Abdullahi Ahmed An Na-im’s Toward an Islamic Reformation gives pioneering viewpoints on reconciling modern human rights standards with Islamic law; it suggests methods of reinterpretation for traditional legal principles according to a modern consciousness of human rights. Along similar lines, Mashood Baderin’s International Human Rights and Islamic Law provides a detailed comparative study of the two fields, thus identifying areas of compatible principles and possible conflicts.

Comparative legal studies have enriched the understanding of Islamic law and its interaction with other legal systems. Comparative Law in a Global Context by Werner Menski contains important discussion on the role of Islamic law in modern legal pluralism. His writing shows how Islamic legal principles both contribute to diverse legal traditions and yet adapt to local situations.

It is in this set of scholarship that one could add recent attempts at renewing Islamic legal studies on methodological grounds. Jasser Auda’s Maqasid al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law introduces a system’s approach to understanding Islamic law in which higher objectives (maqasid) are to be taken into consideration in the legal interpretation. This avenue has opened up new paths for answering contemporary problems while preserving Islamic legal integrity.

Empirical studies on the actual application of Islamic law in different countries have presented some valuable lessons. Jan Michiel Otto’s Sharia Incorporated gives extensive case studies of how countries have incorporated Islamic law in their legal systems, challenges, and successful adoption. The diversity of approaches to employing Islamic law in modern state systems is portrayed by this work.

Several key issues emerge from the literature: the continuing tension between tradition and modernity in interpretation of Islamic laws, the difficulty in being religiously true but making up for modern-day needs, and the plurality of approaches to applying Islamic law in present-day settings. Scholars have done quite a number of things to understand these issues from different perspectives. However, much remained to be done in developing an all-inclusive framework for harmonizing Islamic principles with modern legal requirements.

Relevance of the Study

This research is particularly relevant in the current global context where:

• Many countries are working to harmonize Islamic law with modern legal systems
• There is increasing focus on human rights and gender equality
• Islamic financial systems are gaining global prominence
• Legal pluralism is becoming more recognized and accepted
• Cross-cultural legal understanding is increasingly important

Research Methodology

This study employs a mixed-methodology approach:

• Doctrinal research analyzing primary legal sources
• Comparative analysis of different legal systems
• Historical research examining the evolution of Islamic law
• Case study analysis of significant legal decisions
• Critical analysis of contemporary implementations

HISTORICAL EVOLUTION AND FOUNDATIONAL PRINCIPLES OF ISLAMIC LAW

Evolution has indeed taken one of the very longest strides in both the legal and the legal history, traveling fourteen centuries down its road of jurisprudential evolution. Establishing the groundwork for the comprehensive legal system, the period of formative Islamic law commenced from the Prophet Muhammad’s time, which fell under the 7th century CE. The historical trajectory of Islamic law can be appreciated well under several different heads, each of which is a chapter in the rich history of this jurisprudential mechanism.

During the lifetime of the Prophet, the period was the most direct implementation of divine guidance. The revelations of Quran and interpretations of the Prophet (Sunnah) formed the primary sources of law. It was during this stage that the fundamental jib of conceptions, such as justice, equity, and moral responsibility, of Islamic jurisprudence, had been established. The simplicity and directness of implementation would later serve as an ideal that all generations after the one would seek to understand and apply.

Following the death of the Prophet, the Caliphate period produced an early expansion in the horizon of Islamic legal thought. The reality of governance over an expanding empire required new, more sophisticated legal mechanisms. During this time, the companions of the Prophet, especially the four Rightly Guided Caliphs, established crucial precedents for legal interpretation. Their methods of dealing with new issues illustrated how the principles of Islamic law could be applied to new circumstances while still maintaining fundamental religious fidelity.

Emerging was the systematic Islamic legal scholarship during the Umayyad and Abbasid periods. Within it also emerged the formative madhahib or schools of Islamic law, each of which elaborated a unique methodology for deriving legal rulings. The Hanafi school, established by Abu Hanifa (d. 767 CE), was by far the most prominent for its attention to rational reasoning and analogical deduction (qiyas). The practice of the community of Medina is what was taken more into consideration by the Maliki school, which was founded by Malik ibn Anas (d. 795 CE). The Shafi’i school that was established by Muhammad al-Shafi’i (d. 820 CE) developed a highly sophisticated methodology to strike a balance between textual evidence and rational interpretation, while that of Ahmad ibn Hanbal (d. 855 CE) is noted for a very strict adherence to textual sources.

Therefore, development in usul al-fiqh (principles of jurisprudence) was a very critical point in the course of development in Islamic legal theory. Al-Shafi’i’s “Al-Risala” served to create the hierarchy of sources of law and guided methodological principles for their future development. This systematic approach towards legal reasoning would ensure consistency while also allowing flexibility in dealing with new situations.

Islamic law furthered by ijtihad experienced growth as an instrument of legal development. Earliest jurists realized that with primary sources of Islamic law being finite, situations needing legal attention were infinite. This led to the development of more elaborate methodologies for extending legal principles to new cases, including qiyas, istihsan, and maslaha.

Islamic law as a whole attained unprecedented levels of sophistication during the medieval period. Scholars compiled colossal books of law, treating various aspects of human existence. Scholars like Al-Ghazali would further refine this concept as a theoretical approach underlining the higher purposes behind legal rulings: maqasid al-shari’ah. Such theoretical developments helped guarantee that the legal interpretations were manifestations of the overarching aims of the religion: to protect religion, life, intellect, lineage, and property.

Islamic law underwent a significant evolution with the help of the interaction with customs (urf) present in the different regions. As Islam spread into territories distant from Arabia, the question arose about how local practices would fit into the Islamic legal framework with the consequent emergence of the legal maxim ‘al-‘ada muhakkama’ (custom has legal authority) serving as a convenient tool for the incorporation of those local practices deemed beneficial to Islamic law.

The Ottoman period was another notable stage in the development of Islamic law, especially with the promulgation of the Mejelle: the first attempt at the codification of Islamic civil law. This codification was another approach to Islamic law, adjusting it to suit the needs of a modern state yet preserving its religious character. The structure of the Mejelle would show that traditional Islamic law may still be organized into a fashion compatible with modern legal administration.

Thus, during colonial times, the consequences for the Islamic legal system created obstacles to its proper operation and constituted a process through which great changes began to occur. In many Muslim-majority communities, the Islamic legal system was either partly or completely replaced by European legal codes, although family laws mostly continued to be applied according to Islamic principles. This period gave rise to intense debates regarding the relationship between Islamic law and modern legal systems-a discourse that continues to influence contemporary theories of legal reform.

Author: Sufian Ahmed, in case of any queries please contact/write back to us via email to chhavi@khuranaandkhurana.com or at Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorney.

REFERENCES

1. Abu Hamid Al-Ghazali, AL-MUSTASFA MIN ‘ILM AL-USUL [THE CLARIFIED IN LEGAL THEORY] (Ahmad Zaki Mansur Hammad trans., Univ. of Chicago Press 1987) (1111)
2. Ibn Taymiyyah, AL-SIYASAH AL-SHAR’IYYAH FI ISLAH AL-RA’I WA-AL-RA’IYAH [THE RELIGIOUS POLICY FOR THE REFORMATION OF THE RULER AND THE RULED] (Omar Farrukh trans., Khayats 1966) (1328)
3. Joseph Schacht, AN INTRODUCTION TO ISLAMIC LAW (Oxford Univ. Press 1964)
4. Kecia Ali, SEXUAL ETHICS AND ISLAM: FEMINIST REFLECTIONS ON QUR’AN, HADITH, AND JURISPRUDENCE (Oneworld Publications, 2d ed. 2016)
5. Mahmoud A. El-Gamal, ISLAMIC FINANCE: LAW, ECONOMICS, AND PRACTICE (Cambridge Univ. Press 2006)
6. Mashood A. Baderin, INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS AND ISLAMIC LAW (Oxford Univ. Press 2003)
7. Mohammad Hashim Kamali, PRINCIPLES OF ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE (Islamic Texts Soc’y, 3d ed. 2003)
8. Mohammad S. El-Awa, PUNISHMENT IN ISLAMIC LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY (Am. Trust Publications 1982)