Is Software Patentable in India?

Date : May 28, 2019

Introduction

The fast growing software industry and a faster pace of technological advancements have made it essential to protect the intellectual property (IP) vested in the software, programs and all those machines that use such programs and software. Software are a set of instructions that commands the operation of a system and are intangible in nature. Due to this different nature of the software, it falls outside the category of any traditional goods and thus, it won’t be justified to treat it in a like manner with other goods. Unlike other traditional goods, when a software is sold, the buyer gets a license to use the particular software along with some other particular and specified rights indicating the dos and don’ts for the licensee.

Software and computer programs face a cutthroat competition in the market and are pretty vulnerable to suffer undue economic loss as it might be accessed by users without payment and also, software are vulnerable to piracy and being copied. Further, due to fierce competition, there is a serious threat of being outdated very soon as the competitors might bring a competing product quickly. Protection of software under IPR mechanism will not just protect the economic interest of the owner but also will promote innovation and creativity.

Software and IP Laws

Talking of software, copyright and patent are two IP protection that comes to the mind, immediately. Copyright is the most common method of protecting software program as writing source code and programs is similar to writing any type of literary or artistic work. Patent is the strongest way to protect an IP but there are many stringent criteria to be fulfilled in order to get a patent for software. Further, copyright infringement and piracy of software is not something new in this digital era, rather with such advanced technology it is even possible to copy the entire program code. Adding to that, copyright protection does not protect the process, procedure or discovery. In general, novelty, non-obviousness and industrial usage are the criteria for granting patent to any invention, however, computer software and algorithms fall in a different category. Patent laws create an exception with scientific discoveries, mathematical formulae, and algorithms. Computer programs are considered as a form of applied mathematics. In India, software is not directly patented but it can be granted patent if it is attached with novel hardware, an invention which is unique and capable of industrial use.

According to RBI’s annual survey, export of India’s software services increased by 11.6% to $108.4 billion in 2017-18. For such expansion and growth of the software industry, the IP laws have been amended time and again. However, there is still no law that specifically and exclusively deals with software and computer programs. Software is protected under copyright, patents and at sometimes under the trade secrets. Even though we have legal provisions for IP protection, but the country fails in having a developed jurisprudence and therefore, American approach is applied majority of the times in dealing with such cases. Even the amended Information Technology Act of 2008 does not talk about the IP protection of computer software and programs.

Software and Copyright

According to Sec. 2 (o) of the Copyright Act, 1957, computer programs come within the ambit of literary works. However, the Act does not distinguish between the source codes and object code and so, both are covered under the literary work of the computer program. However, for a software or computer program to be granted copyright protection, it is essential that the work is original.

As a general rule, the owner of the copyright is the author of the work himself. However, in case of employee-employer relationship, unless an agreement to the contrary, if the work is made during the course of the employment, employer is the first owner of the work. Similar to the case of employer-employee relation is the case with the software and computer program. The owner of the copyrighted software has exclusive right to store and reproduce the software. Any third party doing the same without property authority will be liable for copyright infringement.

However, the Act permits fair use and reverse engineering of the program and the same won’t constitute to be an infringement. Further, creating copies or adaptation of such program by a lawful possessor of such program in order to create temporary back up for the chances of loss or destruction of such software program, for the purpose for which it was transferred, shall not amount to infringement. In addition to these, any person having been granted a license by the copyright owner to use his copyrighted work, cannot be made liable for copyright infringement.

Software and Patent

Though the expression of the methods of programming codes can be copyrighted, the operational methods and principles of the program cannot be granted a copyright. Also, since reverse engineering is a fair use of the program, reverse engineering of trade secret is permissible.

Hence, patent becomes essential for protection of software as patent works on scope and not on how one developed the work. Patent can be an ideal solution when the question concerns protection of ideas and functional aspect of a software. But, for being granted a patent, it is necessary that the program is not merely an algorithm but is a technical invention that is eligible for such grant of patent. As per Sec. 3 (k) of the Patent Act, 2002, computer program cannot be patented per se.

For a computer software to be eligible for a patent grant, it must not be –

1. Business method, mathematical method or algorithm

2. A computer program that cannot be patentable

However, a software can be patented if it is attached to an invention and that it is a component of such invention. To avoid the claim of sec. 3 (k) it is essential to show that a hardware is an essential part of the invention along with the software or computer program.

Similar to copyright, patent laws also allows the patent owner to give license or assign his patented work to any individual or third party giving them certain rights over patented work. Such license is to be granted by a written agreement wherein all the terms and conditions are precisely mentioned.

Software and Trade Secrets

Idea, structure or design specification of software may be included as a trade secret. Trade secret protection depends on the nature of the software and how it is distributed. A software which is distributed only as an object code can be protected partially if the source code is kept confidential.

However, there are several limitations to trade secret acting as a method of protection. There is no way the owner can have a remedy against any person or party who is able to reverse engineer the trade secret from the data made available in the public domain. It is further important to mention that if software or computer technology is vulnerable and can be easily copied, then such technology is not fit to be a trade secret.

Trade Secrets are protected under contract and tort laws in India. However, such contractual protection is limited to the parties that sign the contract and thus, does not have any effect on the parties who are not a party to the contract provided they act in good faith.

Software Contracts

Similar to any other contract, software contracts are also governed by the Indian Contract Act. Such software contracts can be in the form of agreement or license or maybe sale. If a software fits into the definition of “goods” as per Sale of Goods Act, which includes any movable property tangible or intangible, shall be governed by the principles and provisions of Sale of Goods Act. In Tata Consultancy Services v. State of Andhra Pradesh (271 ITR 401) Supreme Court considered software to be good, further stating that irrespective of the IP of a software, computer software can be considered as ‘goods’ and is liable for taxes.

License Agreement

Though there is no stopping of the rightful owner of a software or computer program from granting access to his work to any third party, it has been seen that the owners of software prefer granting license to the buyers than actually selling the software to one. This is preferred for the reason that license is firstly governed by IP laws and further, license provide a scope of retention of some substantial and important rights related to the software and leaves greater chances of controlling the software with the owner of the said software. As a result, such software license ensures that almost all rights are reserved with the owner except the right of running the software on the licensee’s device.

Conclusion

In general, protection of computer software in India is under the copyright laws, itself. However, there is a scope of protection of literal and non-literal parts of the software, fair use criteria and authors right under the ambit of license agreements which is yet to be discovered and recognised by the Indian courts. It is further concluded that such program can also be protected under the patent laws provided that it is not merely an algorithm based software but is an invention per se. With no proper legislation defining the scope of protection of software as a trade secret, trade secret seems as a limited and restricted option for protection of IP vested in the software.

In such an advancing and growing digital era, having such limited options for protection of one’s original work in the field of software and computers might lead to lack of innovation and creativeness coming forward. Hence, it is essential that all these laws which are so scattered and vaguely made, be developed and put in place for better protection of the creator’s work.

About the Author: Sonal Sodhani, BA LLB student from Bharti Vidhyapeeth, Pune, Intern at IP and Legal Filings  and can be reached at support@ipandlegalfilings.com.

References:

1. https://www.indiafilings.com/learn/software-patent-registration/

2. https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/technology/indias-software-service-exports-increased-in-2017-18-rbi-data-3273701.html

3. V T Thomas v. Malayala Manorama, AIR 1988 Ker. 291

4. http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/14456/1/JIPR%2017%284%29%20284-295.pdf

5. Ibid